Peer Reviewer Process

All manuscripts submitted to JUMIE : Jurnal Mega Inovasi Ekonomi are reviewed by at least one reviewer from the Editorial Review Board or peer reviewers whose expertise is closely related to the subject area of the submitted manuscript.

The journal applies a double-blind peer review process, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process. Manuscripts must be submitted in their complete form and be ready for evaluation for publication. The journal does not consider submissions based solely on abstracts.

Reviewers are expected to provide constructive evaluations, comments, suggestions, and recommendations to help authors improve the quality of their manuscripts. The review process considers originality, scientific quality, research methodology, topic relevance, clarity of presentation, and the article’s contribution to the advancement of knowledge.

Reviewer feedback is intended to assist authors in improving the content, structure, writing style, and other aspects of the manuscript, thereby enhancing the overall academic quality of the published article.