Peer Reviewer Process

All manuscripts submitted to Mega Agroakuatika Journal undergo a peer-review process conducted by at least one reviewer with expertise relevant to the subject area of the submitted manuscript.

The journal applies a double-blind peer-review system, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure an objective and unbiased evaluation process. Manuscripts are reviewed in their complete form and must be ready for publication consideration; submissions based solely on abstracts are not accepted.

Reviewers are responsible for evaluating the scientific quality, originality, methodology, clarity of presentation, and contribution of the manuscript to the advancement of knowledge. In addition to providing recommendations to the editor, reviewers are expected to offer constructive comments and suggestions to help authors improve the content, structure, and overall quality of their articles.

The final decision regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection of a manuscript is made by the editor based on the reviewers’ evaluations and the journal’s editorial policies.